ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT AS DETERMINANTS OF DEFENCE INDUSTRY TRANSFORMATION
Анотація
The contemporary geopolitical landscape is characterised by a growing nexus between national security and technological sovereignty, underscoring the imperative for nations to transform their defence industries. Despite the considerable financial resources that are frequently allocated to this sector, the outcomes of such investments exhibit significant variation across countries. The present study addresses the critical research problem of why some nations successfully transition from being technology importers to those which are globally competitive in terms of exports, whilst others remain in a state of prolonged technological dependence despite making substantial expenditures. The central thesis of this article is that a country's successful transformation from an importer to an exporter of defence products is determined not by the volume of financial resources available to it, but rather by the effectiveness of its institutional environment and the implementation of a coherent, long-term state policy. In order to test this hypothesis, a conceptual framework is developed and subsequently applied through a comparative analysis of two cases: the Republic of Korea and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The results of the analysis indicate that the key differentiating factor is the institutional environment. The South Korean success is attributed to the establishment of robust, centralised state agencies and the consistent implementation of a strategic import policy with a focus on technology absorption, which systematically nurtured a dynamic innovation ecosystem. Conversely, Saudi Arabia's trajectory exemplifies the inefficacy of institutional fragmentation and a policy of direct, "off-the-shelf" procurement in fostering domestic innovation capabilities, resulting in diminished absorptive capacity and a dependent industrial base. The core finding is that a robust innovation ecosystem is not a prerequisite for development; rather, it is a deliberately constructed result of effective institutions. The research outlines how the massive influx of Western technology can be converted into a sustainable, export-oriented defence industry through targeted institutional reforms, a focus on enhancing national absorptive capacity and the strategic development of technological competencies.
Посилання
Anicetti, J. (2024). Defence Offsets and the Global Arms Trade: Explaining Cross-National Variations (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003396956
Burykh, D. (2025). Post-war recovery of regional economies through the development of financial infrastructure. Economics of Systems Development, 7(1), 26-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2707-8019/2025-1-4
Chaziza, Y., & Lutmar, C. (2025). Saudi Arabia’s niche diplomacy: A middle power’s strategy for global influence. World, no. 6(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020065
Hafeez A., Shamsuddin A.B., & Saeed B. (2023). An Empirical Investigation of Absorptive Capacity on Technology Transfer Effectiveness Through Organizational Innovation. International Journal of Professional Business Review, no. 8(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i2.1550
Hamblin R., Plimmer G., Badar K., & Lasthuizen K. (2024). Organizational Ambidexterity: A Bibliometric Review and Framework for Future Public Administration Research. Public Performance & Management Review, no. 47(5), pp. 1073-1109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2373178
Hassan, O. (2020). Artificial intelligence, Neom, and Saudi Arabia’s economic diversification from oil and gas. The Political Quarterly, no. 91(1), pp. 82-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.12794
Honig, B., Lerner, M., & Raban, Y. (2006). Social capital and the linkages of high-tech companies to the military defense system: Is there a signaling mechanism? Small Business Economics, no. 27(4), pp. 419-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-5644-y
Kwon, P. B. (2023). Defender of the Nation, Champion of Science: The Agency for Defense Development as a nexus for the technological transformation of South Korea. Journal of Korean Studies, no. 28(1), pp. 59-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/07311613-10213182
Lee J.G., & Park M.J. (2020). Evaluation of technological competence and operations efficiency in the defence industry: The strategic planning of South Korea. Evaluation and Programme Planning, no. 79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101775
Nebrat, V. (2022). Polityka povoiennoho vidnovlennia ekonomiky: dosvid Respubliky Koreia [The policy of post-war economic recovery: the experience of the Republic of Korea]. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia – Economy and Forecasting, no. (4), pp. 43-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2022.04.043 (in Ukrainian)
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Park, T. G. (2012). The roles of the United States and Japan in the development of South Korea's science and technology during the Cold War. Korea Journal, no. 52(1), pp. 206-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2012.52.1.206
Reis, J., Melão, N., Costa, J., & Pernica, B. (2022). Defence industries and open innovation: ways to increase military capabilities of the Portuguese ground forces. Defence Studies, no. 22(3), pp. 354-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2033117
SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute). (2025). SIPRI Arms Transfers Database. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/databases/armstransfers (accessed August 31, 2025).
Tsyrfa I., Kopiika V., Minhazutdinov I., Doroshko M., & Medvedieva M. (2024). Political and legal analysis of the mechanisms of providing Ukraine with resources of strategic importance in the context of increasing the national defence potential. Military Logistics Systems, no. 60(1), pp. 217-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37055/slw/194217
Winkelbach, A., & Walter, A. (2015). Complex technological knowledge and value creation in science-to-industry technology transfer projects: The moderating effect of absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, no. 47, pp. 98-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.035
Zavazhenko, A. O. (2023). Formuvannia ta vrehuliuvannia instytutsiinykh dysfunktsii transformatsiinoi ekonomiky Ukrainy [Formation and regulation of institutional dysfunctions of the transformational economy of Ukraine]. Naukovyi pohliad: ekonomika ta upravlinnia – Scientific view: economics and management, no. 1(81), pp. 7-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2521-666X/2023-81-1 (in Ukrainian)
