THE RESILIENCE OF THE POPULATION LIFE QUALITY IN UKRAINE IN THE COORDINATES OF ECONOMIC AND EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT: METHODOLOGY, PRIORITIES FOR IMPROVING RELATIONSHIPS
Abstract
In a globalised world, the key task of policy is to maintain national security and economic competitiveness by optimising the systemic influences of the employment sphere on the quality of life and reproduction of society, which involves assessing the satisfaction of territorial and functional communities and social groups with their living conditions and the institutional framework of the state. The article aims to study the conditions, factors and potential problems involved in ensuring and improving the quality of life of the Ukrainian population, particularly in terms of employment and the national economy. This research requires a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the employment sphere on the reproduction and dynamics of population life quality parameters, indicators and benchmarks in a coordinated policy for establishing and improving socio-economic development resilience potential in the short and long term. It also requires the substantiation of the methodology of systemic interactions and relationships in the employment sphere and the economy in general, alongside assessments and expectations of a range of social groups regarding the possibilities for ensuring, preserving and improving life quality. The study is based on the concepts and theories of socio-humanitarian potential, social capital, sustainable development, and the resilience of the economy and society. It also considers the social state and the welfare state, as well as the inclusion of groups identified according to a spectrum of social vulnerability criteria. The methodology for identifying problems, features and criteria, as well as prospects for ensuring acceptable parameters and enhancing population resilience and quality of life by optimising processes that capitalise on individual, community and nationwide socio-humanitarian potential in the employment sphere and the economy as a whole, combines empirical and theoretical methods (in particular, analysis, induction, extrapolation and synthesis). The prospects for improving Ukrainian socio-economic policy in terms of increasing life quality resilience (particularly in the context of mitigating threats and ensuring public acceptance of results) are largely related to the systematisation of structural changes in ensuring productive employment for the population; optimising the working environment and occupational safety; providing educational and household support for employment and labour mobility; and improving economic, legal and everyday household culture, including promoting legal labour. The main factors influencing population growth and improving quality of life, which are transmitted through the employment sphere and function within it, include institutional, socio-economic, socio-labour, cultural, and educational factors.
References
Andreitseva I. A., & Sikora V. I. (2024) Yakist zhyttia naselennia Ukrainy: analiz y kryterii otsinky [Quality of life of the population of Ukraine: analysis and assessment criteria]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient economy, no. 3. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2024.3.75
Andreitseva I. A. (2021) Dokhody i yakist zhyttia naselennia Ukrainy: suchasnyi stan [Incomes and quality of life of the population of Ukraine: current status]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, no. 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-29-27
Bielikova N., Indyka S., Tsos A., & Vashchuk L. (2022) [Quality of life in war-affected population]. Fizychne vykhovannia, sport i kultura zdorovia v suchasnomu suspilstvi – Physical education, sports and health culture in modern society, no. 1(57), pp. 3–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2022-01-03-09
Gukalova I. V. (2023) Yakist zhyttia naselennia v umovakh viiny: aktualnist prostorovykh sposterezhen [Life quality of the population in war conditions: relevance of spatial observations]. Ukrainska heohrafiia u vyklykakh viiny [Ukrainian geography in the challenges of war]. Kherson: Kherson State University, (pp. 57–59). (in Ukrainian) Available at: https://ekhsuir.kspu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/6b5c06da-7505-47b1-bdf1-700305799176/content (accessed December 10, 2025).
Halaiko N. V., Stoliarenko O. O., & Kravchuk O. V. (2020) Analiz yakosti zhyttia naselennia v Ukraini [Analysis of quality of life of the population in Ukraine]. Prychornomorski ekonomichni studii – Black sea economic studies, no. 49, pp. 135–140. Available at: https://dspace.lvduvs.edu.ua/bitstream/1234567890/2965/1/1.%20%d0%93%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%b0%d0%b9%d0%ba%d0%be%20%d0%9d.%d0%92..pdf (accessed December 10, 2025).
Interfax – Ukraine (2025) Prozhytkovyi minimum v Ukraini maie buty pidvyshcheno dlia zabezpechennia bazovykh potreb hromadian – nardep Tretiakova [The subsistence minimum in Ukraine should be increased to ensure the citizens’ basic needs – people’s deputy Tretyakova]. Available at: https://ua.interfax.com.ua/news/economic/1089311.html (accessed December 10, 2025).
Kyryliuk V. V., Koliadych O. I., & Shevchuk O. V. (2024) Yakist zhyttia naselennia Ukrainy: stan, tendentsii, perspektyvy [Quality of life of the population of Ukraine: state, trends, prospects]. BiznesInform – Business Inform, no. 7, pp. 328–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-7-328-334
Melnychuk D. P., Shpytalenko G. A., Trostenyuk T. M., & Khomyak L. I. (2020) Mizhnarodna praktyka otsiniuvannia yakosti zhyttia naselennia litnoho viku: systematyzatsiia ta analiz iz pozytsii teorii sotsialnoi derzhavy [International practice of assessing the life quality of the elderly population: systematization and analysis from the perspective of the social state theory]. Ekonomika, upravlinnia ta administruvannia – Economics, management and administration, no. 4(94), pp. 110–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/jen-2020-4(94)-110-116
Palchuk O. I. (2018) Yakist zhyttia naselennia: hrani problem u fokusi peretvoren [Quality of life of the population: the faces of problems in the focus of transformation]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky – Global and national problems of economics, no. 21, pp. 96–102. Available at: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/21-2018/20.pdf (accessed December 10, 2025).
Poliakova O. Yu., Hrypich O. V., & Levanda O. M. (2021) Analiz chynnykiv vplyvu na yakist zhyttia naselennia Ukrainy [Analysing the factors of influence on life quality of the population of Ukraine]. BiznesInform – Business Inform, no. 1, pp. 199–206. Available at: https://www.business-inform.net/export_pdf/business-inform-2021-1_0-pages-199_206.pdf (accessed December 10, 2025).
Poplavska O. M., & Shevchuk O. V. (2020) Yakist zhyttia silskoho naselennia: problemy, perspektyvy pokrashchennia [Quality of life of rural population: problems, prospects of improvement]. Ekonomichnyi prostir – Economic space, no. 159, pp. 141–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/159-29
Rybalova O. V., Bryhada O. V., Korobkina K. M., & Gorban A. V. (2020) Metodychni pidkhody do otsinky yakosti zhyttia naselennia [Methodological approaches to the assessment of the life’s quality of the population]. The scientific heritage, no. 52, pp. 24–27. Available at: http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/11412 (accessed December 10, 2025).
Ryndzak O. T. (2021) Yakist zhyttia naselennia: kontseptualizatsiia poniattia [Quality of life: conceptualization of the term]. Modern Economics, no. 29(2021), pp. 151–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.V29(2021)-23
Shtuler I. Yu. (2020) Otsiniuvannia yakosti zhyttia silskoho naselennia: osoblyvosti ta znachennia [Assessment of the quality of life of the rural population: features and significance]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky – Actual problems of economics, no. 5(227), pp. 4–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32752/1993-6788-2020-1-227-4-10
Stavytskyy A., & Molokanova K. (2020) Modeliuvannia yakosti zhyttia naselennia v Ukraini ta krainakh Yevropy [Modelling quality of life in Ukraine and European countries]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. T. Shevchenka. Seriia: Ekonomika – Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, no. 6(213), pp. 20–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2020/213-6/3

