RESILIENCE OF HUMANITARIAN CLUSTERS: REFLEXIVE AND ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE
Abstract
A sociological conceptualisation of the humanitarian cluster as a specific organisational form of network governance has been developed in the context of war, protracted crisis, multi-level uncertainty and regulatory pressure. It is demonstrated that the effectiveness of cluster coordination depends not only on the stability of procedures and the continuity of operations, but also on the system’s ability to learn, rethink management frameworks, work with feedback and preserve institutional memory. The aim of the article is to develop a conceptual framework for analysing the resilience of humanitarian clusters by combining approaches from the sociology of organisations, adaptive and reflexive governance, as well as discussions on accountability and learning in the humanitarian sphere. The research methodology is based on a conceptual synthesis of the principles of organisational sociology, a generalisation of normative and practical approaches to humanitarian coordination, and an interpretation of the role of MEAL systems, digital tools and accountability mechanisms within the governance architecture. It is demonstrated that the resilience of a humanitarian cluster is an emergent property of the governance architecture, rather than a derivative of individual staff resilience, formal compliance with donor requirements, or the technical efficiency of procedures. It is argued that the key co-constitutive capacities of such an architecture are responsiveness and reflexivity: the former ensures the timely detection and consideration of environmental signals, whilst the latter involves reviewing the methods of their interpretation, criteria of relevance and management frameworks. It is demonstrated that MEAL systems, KPIs, digital platforms, complaints and feedback mechanisms, as well as models of interaction with donors, should be understood as components of the governance infrastructure through which contextual signals are translated into changes in practice. The practical value of the article lies in the proposed multidimensional framework for assessing the resilience of a humanitarian cluster, suitable for use by humanitarian programme managers, cluster coordinators, MEAL specialists and managers of partner organisations to improve management procedures, indicator design, coordination mechanisms and institutional learning processes.
References
Beck U. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE, 1992. URL: https://books.google.com/books/about/Risk_Society.html?id=W2sDTHaSiiYC
Blanchet K., Nam S. L., Ramalingam B., Pozo-Martin F. Governance and capacity to manage resilience of health systems: Towards a new conceptual framework. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2017. Vol. 6, no. 8. P. 431–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.36
Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS). The Standard | CHS 2024. URL: https://corehumanitarianstandard.org/the-standard
Djalante R., Holley C., Thomalla F. Adaptive governance and managing resilience to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 2011. Vol. 2. P. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-011-0015-6
Feindt P. H., Weiland S. Reflexive governance: exploring the concept and assessing its critical potential for sustainable development. Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 2018. Vol. 20, no. 6. P. 661–674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1532562
Folke C., Carpenter S. R., Walker B., Scheffer M., Chapin T., Rockström J. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society. 2010. Vol. 15, no. 4. Art. 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420
Holling C. S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1973. Vol. 4. P. 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
IASC Sub-Working Group on the Cluster Approach and the Global Cluster Coordinators’ Group. Guidance: Cluster coordination at country level (Revised July 2015). URL: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/reference-module-cluster-coordination-country-level-revised-july-2015
The Grand Bargain. Official website. URL: https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/grand-bargain
Voß J.-P., Bornemann B. The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecology and Society. 2011. Vol. 16, no. 2. Art. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04051-160209
Copyright (c) 2026 Олег Демків, Руслан Савчинський, Анна Кудринська

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

